IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v9y2009i1p1-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of technical skills effectiveness of men’s National Volleyball teams

Author

Listed:
  • Patsiaouras Asterios
  • Charitonidis Kostantinos
  • Moustakidis Athanasios
  • Kokaridas Dimitrios

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the technical elements that could lead to a prediction to winning or losing a match by taking into account the differences of the technical elements recorded among the teams that participated in the Japan word volleyball championship (Pool B). The sample consisted of 6 national men’s teams who competed in the frames of world championship during the 2006 period. The recording was made by using the official statistical logistic package of the European Confederation (CEV). Additional statistical analysis of the results took place by using the SPSS 11 statistical package. Discriminant analysis was conducted to select which subset of the measured variables significantly contributed to the prediction of winning or losing a match. Results showed that “attack error”, “jump services point”, “quick ball error“, and “jump serves”, led to the prediction of the match outcome (winning or losing a match) whereas “attack after reception” and “quick ball attack” emerged as the decisive factors for team qualification.

Suggested Citation

  • Patsiaouras Asterios & Charitonidis Kostantinos & Moustakidis Athanasios & Kokaridas Dimitrios, 2009. "Comparison of technical skills effectiveness of men’s National Volleyball teams," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:9:y:2009:i:1:p:1-7
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2009.11868460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2009.11868460
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2009.11868460?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:9:y:2009:i:1:p:1-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.