IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v8y2008i1p127-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A movement classification for the investigation of agility demands and injury risk in sport

Author

Listed:
  • Gemma Robinson
  • Peter O’Donoghue

Abstract

The purpose of the current paper is to propose a movement classification scheme to be used when investigating injury risk from movement and agility demands of sporting activities. The method was tested and found to be operated with acceptable reliability by the authors. However, the method can be used more reliably for the analysis of soccer than it can for sports like tennis and netball where more direction changes and braking movements occur. The validity of the method was explored by applying it to 8 different cases from 7 different sports to ensure it covered the key events associated with agility demands and injury risk from movement within those sports. The method has over the advantage the Bloomfield Movement Classification is that different path change and turn types can be entered directly by the observer rather than having to be inferred through temporal analysis of the data. This also applies to acceleration and deceleration events although there are accelerations from non-stationary situations and decelerations to non-stationary situations not covered by the method. The method allows different sports and, indeed, different conditions within the same sport to be compared in terms of injury risk from movement and agility demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Gemma Robinson & Peter O’Donoghue, 2008. "A movement classification for the investigation of agility demands and injury risk in sport," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 127-144, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:8:y:2008:i:1:p:127-144
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2008.11868428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2008.11868428
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2008.11868428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:8:y:2008:i:1:p:127-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.