IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v8y2008i1p113-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The quantification of contacts with impact during professional rugby matches

Author

Listed:
  • Michele van Rooyen
  • Kristy Rock
  • Sebastian Prim
  • Mike Lambert

Abstract

To gain a complete understanding of a player’s total physiological stress exposure the measure of contact with impact in match situations must be addressed. The goal of this study was to quantify the contact stress players were exposed to in a rugby match. 7 Matches in a professional provincial rugby competition were analyzed to determine the frequency of the contact situations for each player. There were 386 (range 306 – 535) impact contacts per match. The forwards were involved in 68% impact contacts with 257 per match (range 199 – 389). The backline players were involved in 125 (range 93 - 148) impact contacts per match. The most frequently occurring impact contact for the whole team was contact with the ground, 108 impacts per match (range 70 – 133) followed by the scrum impact, 81 impacts per match (47 – 100). Lineout contact impacts were the least frequently observed with 2 per match (range 1 – 4). 80% of the impact contacts were recorded at a higher frequency when the team lost as opposed to when they won. These findings have the potential to influence how players are prepared for matches and managed over a season.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele van Rooyen & Kristy Rock & Sebastian Prim & Mike Lambert, 2008. "The quantification of contacts with impact during professional rugby matches," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 113-126, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:8:y:2008:i:1:p:113-126
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2008.11868427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2008.11868427
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2008.11868427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:8:y:2008:i:1:p:113-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.