IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v7y2007i3p37-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Average swimming speeds for 6 sections of the 50-meter backstroke race: Comparison of performance in zones swum underwater or at the surface in 12 international short course events

Author

Listed:
  • Luc Collard

Abstract

We measured the speed of 12 international-level swimmers (6♀ and 6♀) for 6 sections of the 50m backstroke race in a short course (25m) pool (0-5m; 5-15m; 15-25m; 25-30m; 30-40m; 40-50m) by breaking down the races using video analysis. Our assessment revealed that swimmers went faster when underwater (independently of the benefit obtained by pushing off the pool wall in the 0-5m and 25-30m zones) than when they swam at the surface. These results were supported by the per-zone speed ranking established by the vast majority of 151 sports students acting as observers. The latter viewed each race 3 times, in order to divide up the race into the 6 zones using frame-by-frame images (with an index of agreement of more than 76%, according to Pareto’s criterion). Only the per-zone speed rankings for the 3 slowest female swimmers deviated from the majority ranking (using Kendall’s L statistic), as the result of a shorter underwater segment during the 2nd length.Despite being considered (by the sport’s rules and in scientific terms) as a subsidiary and disruptive element of propulsion, underwater dolphin kicks are responsible for the highest speeds in this type of event.

Suggested Citation

  • Luc Collard, 2007. "Average swimming speeds for 6 sections of the 50-meter backstroke race: Comparison of performance in zones swum underwater or at the surface in 12 international short course events," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 37-45, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:7:y:2007:i:3:p:37-45
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2007.11868408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2007.11868408
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2007.11868408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:7:y:2007:i:3:p:37-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.