IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v7y2007i1p80-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A reliability study of a Real-Time and Lapsed-Time application for rugby union

Author

Listed:
  • Jason J Williams
  • Mike Hughes
  • Peter O’Donoguhe
  • Gwilym Davies

Abstract

This paper details the reliability study for a computerised lapsed and real-time application for rugby union. The lapsed-time application was written in order to capture match details post event and the real-time application was developed to capture match detail while the match was in progress. The reliability test was conducted using percentage error, which was deemed the most appropriate for this data. For the purpose of the current investigation, a percentage error of under 5% was deemed to be acceptable Three tests were undertaken by the same operator (intra-observer) and the results were presented and discussed. The system was found to be reliable with both systems, but there were some performance indicators that had a percentage error of more than 5%. It was suggested that the majority of high percentage errors stemmed from poor match coverage or poor communication and ambiguity from the referee. Finally, it was noted that in any form of notation there is a trade off between the time taken to notate and the reliability of the captured data. The developed system was shown to be reliable and it would be possible to conclude, that as the percentage differences were so low, the system was reliable.

Suggested Citation

  • Jason J Williams & Mike Hughes & Peter O’Donoguhe & Gwilym Davies, 2007. "A reliability study of a Real-Time and Lapsed-Time application for rugby union," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 80-86, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:7:y:2007:i:1:p:80-86
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2007.11868389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2007.11868389
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2007.11868389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:7:y:2007:i:1:p:80-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.