IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v6y2006i1p149-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An ınvestıgatıon ınto the openıngs used by top 100 chess players

Author

Listed:
  • Ramiz Arabacı

Abstract

The aim of the our study is an ınvestıgatıon ınto the openıngs used by top 100 chess players. The chess games (n=2046) that 70 players, who took part in Top 100 list, played during January-April 2006 period were examined. The frequencies and percentages of the openings used were calculated. Separating the chess players into five different age groups, the frequency values and percentages of the openings they used, and the winning, defeating, and drawing were calculated using the Chi-Square Test and evaluated statistically.The most frequently played openings were as follows respectively: Sicilian defence (n=476; 23,3%), Queen’s Gambit (n=326; 1,9%), Ruy Lopez/Spanish Game (n=252; 12,3%).The kinds of openings, Semi-Open Games (33 %) are the most frequent and Other Black Response To d4 (4,1 %) is the least frequently played. According to the kinds of openings, there are statistically significant differences between the drawings, winnings and defeatings obtained (p<0.05). The kinds of openings played according to age groups, Semi-Open Games are preferred most in the 20 years old or younger, 21 to 30 years old, and 31 to 40 years old age groups, Indian Systems are preferred most in the 41 to 50 years old age group (p<0.05).It can be claimed that Top 100 players prefer Semi-Open Games most; the winning, defeating, and drawing percentages change depending on the increasing age and the kinds of openings played; and the best opening is Caro-Kann for Whites, French Defence for Blacks, and Petrof’s Defence for a draw.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramiz Arabacı, 2006. "An ınvestıgatıon ınto the openıngs used by top 100 chess players," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 149-160, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:6:y:2006:i:1:p:149-160
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2006.11868363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2006.11868363
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2006.11868363?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:6:y:2006:i:1:p:149-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.