IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v5y2005i1p51-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Problems associates with the analysis of the pattern of total cross-country eventing penalty scores at advanced level of competition in the United Kingdom

Author

Listed:
  • T.C. Whitaker
  • J. Hill

Abstract

Eventing is a three phased equestrian sport. It involves the competition of a dressage test, round of show jumps and completion of a cross-country course. The cross-country phase is described by the sports governing body as the most important and influential element of the competition. Within the sport various levels of competition are run and equality of competition should be maintained at within these levels. The paper compares the relative effect of the cross-country phase of competition between 10 advanced events (sub populations) run in during 2003. Non-normality was apparent within the whole population (Kolmogorv Smirnov K statistic = 5.178 (p<0.001); Shapiro Wilks W = 0.711 (P<0.001). The use of Log (x+1) transformation was applied, positive skew (+2.853) was reduced after transformation to −0.543 (Kolmogorov K statistic = 0.754; p>0.05). The influence of extreme kurtosis was removed after transformation (+10.581 reduced to +1.288). The paper suggests that there is considerable variation observed between some sub populations. Measures of central tendency are discussed as comparative measures between events. It is apparent that arithmetic means may be misleading and the uses of other measures of central tendency are discussed including maximum likelihood estimators. Analysis of data distribution using box and whisker plots indicated outliers and extreme outliers were exerting a considerable effect on the population.

Suggested Citation

  • T.C. Whitaker & J. Hill, 2005. "Problems associates with the analysis of the pattern of total cross-country eventing penalty scores at advanced level of competition in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 51-60, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:5:y:2005:i:1:p:51-60
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2005.11868315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2005.11868315
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2005.11868315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:5:y:2005:i:1:p:51-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.