IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v25y2025i4p808-821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance metrics that matter: assessing winning and losing teams in women’s Rugby union

Author

Listed:
  • Mikaela J. Callinan
  • Jonathan D. Connor
  • Wade H. Sinclair
  • Miguel-Ángel Gómez

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify key performance indicators (KPI) that differentiated winning and losing teams, and how KPI may vary in balanced and unbalanced matches in Australian domestic women’s Rugby Union (RU). Four seasons of the Buildcorp Super W competition (2019–2022), round and final matches (n = 47) were analysed by an experienced performance analyst using computerised notational analysis software (Hudl SportsCode) to identify various KPI that occurred throughout a match. Findings showed that winning teams had greater ball-carrying efficiency, quick ruck speed, greater field-based tactics, greater successful conversions, and created more scoring opportunities while losing teams had poorer goal-kicking performance, greater number of rucks lost, and unsuccessful set piece performance. However, in balanced matches, only greater scoring opportunities, possession, and kicking performance discriminated between winning and losing teams. Winning teams in unbalanced matches had greater scoring opportunities, kicking performance, possession, territory, ball-carrying efficiency, and ruck performance, whilst losing teams had a greater number of rucks lost and lineouts lost. These results suggest some performance metrics can differ between balanced and unbalanced matches. Coaches may use these findings to help evaluate match performances based on scoring differential, as well as influence possession-in-territory, and kicking tactics, to increase scoring opportunities.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikaela J. Callinan & Jonathan D. Connor & Wade H. Sinclair & Miguel-Ángel Gómez, 2025. "Performance metrics that matter: assessing winning and losing teams in women’s Rugby union," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 808-821, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:25:y:2025:i:4:p:808-821
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2024.2348268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2024.2348268
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2024.2348268?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:25:y:2025:i:4:p:808-821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.