IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v25y2025i3p489-502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating aerial duel ability of football players using height-adjusted Elo rating model

Author

Listed:
  • Jongwon Kim
  • Sehyeong Kim

Abstract

Football players’ aerial duel ability has been typically evaluated based on the “aerial duel success rate (success/attempt)”. However, sole reliance on this indicator implies excluding other factors like the opponent’s aerial duel ability and height. This makes the evaluation of a player’s true ability difficult. The Elo rating system is an alternative method that addresses such exclusion. This study analysed a player’s aerial duel ability more accurately using an Elo model adjusted by height. All players from all matches in the K League 1 over the 3 seasons were analysed. The player rankings for aerial duel ability calculated using the Elo rating system showed significant differences compared to the rankings based on aerial duel success rates used in previous studies e.g. the player ranked 1st in Elo was 3rd in aerial duel success rate, the 2nd and the 3rd players remained 21st and 54th. These results serve as valuable information for analysing players’ abilities and understanding team tactics in the applied field. These will also be crucial for player evaluation while scouting.

Suggested Citation

  • Jongwon Kim & Sehyeong Kim, 2025. "Evaluating aerial duel ability of football players using height-adjusted Elo rating model," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(3), pages 489-502, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:489-502
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2024.2420458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2024.2420458
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2024.2420458?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:25:y:2025:i:3:p:489-502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.