IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v22y2022i4p558-570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stroke performance relevance model for elite table tennis matches

Author

Listed:
  • Wenming Liu
  • Zheng Zhou
  • Yuwei Shen
  • Hui Zhang

Abstract

To analyse the technical strength of elite table tennis players more accurately, a model of stroke performance relevance (SPR) was proposed in this study, and 40 matches between Chinese male elite players and players from other countries were selected as samples. Compared with other match analysis methods in table tennis, the main advantage of the SPR model is that a) the calculating the performance relevance of each stroke can more completely reflect the technical and tactical advantage or disadvantage of both players than can the traditional analysis methods. b) In addition to the contribution (score) and responsibility (loss) information, the SPR value includes information on the orders of stroke and scores, which can better reflect the role of various game actions in different game periods. This is the most important difference between the SPR model and traditional match analysis methods. In addition, the SPR analysis showed that the first three strokes, the three techniques (“topspin + attack”, touch short, twist), and the three placements (long backhand, long forehand, long middle) in a table tennis match had an important impact on the game results. The technical strength of Chinese players was significantly better than that of players from other countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenming Liu & Zheng Zhou & Yuwei Shen & Hui Zhang, 2022. "Stroke performance relevance model for elite table tennis matches," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 558-570, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:22:y:2022:i:4:p:558-570
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2022.2089514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2022.2089514
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2022.2089514?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:22:y:2022:i:4:p:558-570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.