IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v21y2021i6p1015-1028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of different feedback variants on pacing adherence in a field based running test

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Dobiasch
  • Savvas Stafylidis
  • Arnold Baca

Abstract

Running field tests are utilised to assess the athlete’s fitness level with high specificity. However, in graded exercise tests the lack of speed control can result in an uneven pace, reducing reproducibility and accuracy. The purpose of this study was to develop feedback variants (FV) and investigate their effect on the athlete’s ability to keep the pace constant. Forty-eight participants completed four trials of a Conconi test (randomised) over four paces (7.5 − 10 km·h−1). A smartphone app provided athletes with four FVs: Classic, Sound (verbal), Vibration, and Sound & Vibration. We found a significant effect of FV on adherence (defined as time within 0.3 km·h−1 of target speed): F(3,141) = 41.45, p

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Dobiasch & Savvas Stafylidis & Arnold Baca, 2021. "Effects of different feedback variants on pacing adherence in a field based running test," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 1015-1028, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:21:y:2021:i:6:p:1015-1028
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2021.1968662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2021.1968662
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2021.1968662?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:21:y:2021:i:6:p:1015-1028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.