IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v18y2018i6p1037-1049.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring spatial scoring effectiveness in women’s basketball at the 2016 Olympic Games

Author

Listed:
  • Wade Hobbs
  • Adam D. Gorman
  • Stuart Morgan
  • Mitchell Mooney
  • Jonathan Freeston

Abstract

Basketball strategy is often focused on how to use space on the court. However, very little research has investigated performance from a spatial perspective beyond the now ubiquitous shooting heat maps. The aim of this study was to quantify how effectively teams move the ball across the basketball court and identify the most commonly occurring sequences of ball movement in international women’s basketball. The results of the spatial analysis characterised trends in team play from the women’s 2016 Olympic basketball competition and demonstrated that overall, the right-hand side under the basket and the top-right 3-point area were the most-effective areas on the court. In general terms, the right-hand side of the court was more effective than the left, and the middle of the court was more effective than the wings. Of the teams included in the study, the United States of America demonstrated the greatest overall effectiveness. Finally, the most commonly occurring ball movement sequences were identified with five of the seven teams demonstrating the same pattern. The quantification of spatial effectiveness in the current study provides insight into the specific tendencies of different teams and the areas that lead to the most effective outcomes. Coaches can apply this information to devise game plans aimed at counteracting the specific tendencies of opposing teams.

Suggested Citation

  • Wade Hobbs & Adam D. Gorman & Stuart Morgan & Mitchell Mooney & Jonathan Freeston, 2018. "Measuring spatial scoring effectiveness in women’s basketball at the 2016 Olympic Games," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 1037-1049, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:18:y:2018:i:6:p:1037-1049
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2018.1550892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2018.1550892
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2018.1550892?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:18:y:2018:i:6:p:1037-1049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.