IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v18y2018i4p609-621.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key match activities of different fielding positions and categories in one-day international cricket

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle C. MacDonald Wells
  • John B. Cronin
  • Paul Macadam

Abstract

Fielding has gained considerable importance in the game of cricket; however, there is a paucity of research in this area compared to batting and bowling. The purpose of this study therefore was to quantify the movement demands of one-day international (ODI) fielding. Television footage of eight games (16 innings) from the 2011 ODI World Cup was analysed using the video analysis package SportsCode. The variables of interest included 16 fielding-related activities and two efficiency calculations. These variables were calculated for fielding positions (excluding wicketkeepers) and categories of fielding. There were on average 177 ± 52 fielding contacts and 12 ± 6 fielding mistakes per innings. The activity in the field was split between the fielding categories: 20% close fielding, 51% inner circle fielding and 29% outer circle fielding. The positions with the most fielding activity per innings were bowler (26), cover (24), backward point (14), mid-off (14) and midwicket (14). Understanding the movement demands of cricket fielding provides value to coaches when designing assessments, and individualising training programmes to match positional and categorical (close, inner and outer) fielding demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle C. MacDonald Wells & John B. Cronin & Paul Macadam, 2018. "Key match activities of different fielding positions and categories in one-day international cricket," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 609-621, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:18:y:2018:i:4:p:609-621
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2018.1501994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2018.1501994
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2018.1501994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:18:y:2018:i:4:p:609-621. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.