IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v17y2017i4p510-520.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance probabilities and outcome effects in technical–tactical factors with bout phase changes of mixed martial arts

Author

Listed:
  • Bianca Miarka
  • Ciro José Brito
  • John Amtmann

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to realise an objectivity performance analysis based on technical–tactical actions in different MMA spatiotemporal phases (i.e. keeping distance, clinch and ground combat), and to estimate the extent to which technical–tactical actions in different combat phases could increase the probability of winning. The sample was composed of 1,752 rounds of 584 UFC bouts (Winning vs. Losing) from 67 events in 2013 and 2014. Technical–tactical actions during spatiotemporal changes (i.e. keeping distance, clinch and ground) were observed, according to frequency of attempted and landed strikes (separated in leg, body and head orientations), takedowns, chokes, locks and submissions. Wilcoxon was applied to compare outcomes, and a logistic regression analysis was used to confirm the effects of technical–tactical actions on the dichotomous performance (losing vs. winning), p ≤ .05. The main results showed significant differences in all spatiotemporal changes, except for head and leg strike attempts while keeping the distance. The performance probability was 69.6% for outcomes, 64.5% for winning vs. 74.7% for losing. Furthermore, when verified the Wald’s criterion, it is possible to corroborate that Head Strikes Landed Keeping Distance, Offensive Passes and Takedowns Landed were the most significant variables, which contributed to probability of predicting winning bouts.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianca Miarka & Ciro José Brito & John Amtmann, 2017. "Performance probabilities and outcome effects in technical–tactical factors with bout phase changes of mixed martial arts," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 510-520, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:17:y:2017:i:4:p:510-520
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2017.1360103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2017.1360103
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2017.1360103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:17:y:2017:i:4:p:510-520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.