IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v17y2017i3p190-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Super Rugby from 2011 to 2015

Author

Listed:
  • Riaan Schoeman
  • Derik Coetzee
  • Robert Schall

Abstract

Rugby shows proof of evolution within the professional era due to large contributions from technology and improved training. Evidence of evolution can be traced through statistics. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare match activities over five seasons (2011–2015) of Super Rugby matches played, and to investigate performance indicators that allow discrimination between winning and losing teams. Data from 30 matches per season (4 matches from each of the 15 participating teams) were captured and supplied by the Cheetahs Super Rugby Franchise (Bloemfontein, South Africa), using the Verusco TryMaker Pro. Differences in mean rates were found between seasons and between winning and losing teams. Losing teams showed an increase in rucks and mauls, lost more scrums and missed more tackles. Playing time, scrums lost and penalties decreased from 2011 to 2015, while scrums (1.76%), rucks (0.80%), mauls (4.42%) and tackles (1.07%) showed a slight increase. Significant differences were found for line-outs (mean of 3.5% per year; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7–6.5%; p = 0.0156) and tackles missed (5.7%; 95% CI 3.0–8.4%; p = <0.001). The findings agree with previous research, that most changes can be contributed to the physiological improvement of players and the increased emphasis on perfecting set phases.

Suggested Citation

  • Riaan Schoeman & Derik Coetzee & Robert Schall, 2017. "Analysis of Super Rugby from 2011 to 2015," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 190-201, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:17:y:2017:i:3:p:190-201
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2017.1314122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2017.1314122
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2017.1314122?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:17:y:2017:i:3:p:190-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.