IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v16y2016i3p1102-1108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity of the standing and jump spike tests for monitoring female volleyball players of different levels of competition

Author

Listed:
  • Jose M Palao
  • David Valades

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to study whether the standing spike test and the jump spike test are valid ways to measure the spike speed for players of different ages. The sample included 27 players from the under-18 Spanish national team and the senior Spanish national team. The variables that were studied include the ball speeds of the standing spike and jump spike tests and the level or age group of the players. The results show that players from the senior national team had significantly higher average and peak speeds for the standing spike and jump spike than players from the under-18 national team (p<0.001). For national team under-18 and senior players, significant correlations were found between average and peak ball speeds for both the standing spike test and the jump spike test (p<0.001). The results show that the standing spike test and the jump spike test are valid tests for monitoring the performance of female volleyball players in development. This article provides values which can be used as references to guide the training process in young players.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose M Palao & David Valades, 2016. "Validity of the standing and jump spike tests for monitoring female volleyball players of different levels of competition," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 1102-1108, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:3:p:1102-1108
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2016.11868951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868951
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:3:p:1102-1108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.