IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v16y2016i2p786-805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scoring and general match profile of Super Rugby between 2008 and 2013

Author

Listed:
  • Wilbur Kraak
  • Ranel Venter
  • Frederik Coetzee

Abstract

Rugby research has focused on a range of performance indicators related to game structures and tactical aspects. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the effect of law changes on the match profile of Super Rugby between the 2008 and 2013 seasons. For the purpose of this study the researchers made use of mixed-method methodology. A total of 646 Super Rugby matches were recorded and analyzed by means of the Fairplay video analysis software package. Further semi-structured interviews were conducted with expert coaches, specialist coaches, players and referees and referee coaches. Results revealed a significant increase in the number of points scored (p<0.01) and a decrease in the number of tries scored (p<0.01). Results of the study show that the profile of Super Rugby has changed to a more continuous game dynamic with the increase in the number of ball carries (d=1.34), passes (d=0.43), tackle breaks (d=1.59) and line breaks (d=2.40), and has led to an increase in the number of tackles (d=0.63). A decrease in the number of rucks (d=1.73), mauls (d=0.63), scrums (d=0.27) and scrum resets (d=1.36) was found. An increase in penalty kicks (d=2.04) and a decrease in free kicks (d=0.4.53) between 2008 and 2013 were observed. The general match profile of Super Rugby has moved to a game with fewer scrums and kicks and more ball carries and tackles. According to the interviewed experts, good playing surfaces in the Southern Hemisphere allow for an open-game approach by the teams.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilbur Kraak & Ranel Venter & Frederik Coetzee, 2016. "Scoring and general match profile of Super Rugby between 2008 and 2013," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 786-805, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:2:p:786-805
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2016.11868923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868923
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:2:p:786-805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.