IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v16y2016i1p264-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of errors made by line umpires on ATP tournaments

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Carboch
  • Katerina Vejvodova
  • Vladimir Suss

Abstract

This is the first study in this field investigating the number and extent of line umpires’ errors during two international, Association of Tennis Professionals (ATP) “Masters 1000” tournaments. Hawk-Eye technology was used on these courts, allowing players to challenge line umpires’ calls. The goal of the study was to determine line umpire error rates for calls reviewed by the Hawk-Eye system. We subsequently determined the mean size of errors and analyzed these errors on specific court lines. Data were obtained from official records of the Hawk-Eye system in selected matches and were provided by ATP. Results showed that line umpires made errors in 27% of cases where Hawk-Eye review technology was utilized. This means that an umpire error occurred once per 17.4 games. The mean size of line umpires’ errors reached 33.2 mm. Most errors occurred at the baseline. A difference in the number and size of errors between cross (transverse) and long lines was found, which suggests that the results for long and cross lines should be treated separately in the evaluation of line umpires’ performance. The line umpires made fewer and smaller mistakes towards the end of a tournament in comparison to its beginning. It is misleading to evaluate line umpires’ performance in %. We suggest that the coefficient 1 error per N games should be used instead.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Carboch & Katerina Vejvodova & Vladimir Suss, 2016. "Analysis of errors made by line umpires on ATP tournaments," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 264-275, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:1:p:264-275
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2016.11868885
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868885
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868885?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:taf:rpanxx:v:17:y:2017:i:6:p:961-969 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:1:p:264-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.