IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v16y2016i1p133-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time-motion and tactical analysis of Olympic judo fighters

Author

Listed:
  • Bianca Miarka
  • Fabrício B. Del Vecchio
  • Ricardo Julianetti
  • Rubiana Cury
  • Suzi Camey
  • Emerson Franchini

Abstract

The present research aimed to compare a time-motion and tactical analysis between international competition and Olympic combats during judo matches. The study considered 2,316 male combats in 2011 and 2012 by 22 men from each class as the world’s best and qualified for the 2012 Olympics Games. From this amount, a randomized selection of 112 combat performances (56 from international competitions (winning combats=56, losing combats=56) and 56 from Olympic combats (winning combats=56, losing combats=56)). The combat phases observed were: i) approach, ii) gripping, iii) attack (separated in four orientations), iv) defense, v) groundwork combat, and vi) pause. Analysis of variances with repeated measures was conducted, p≤0.05. Regarding the Groundwork combat, Losing Olympic combats, with 33.9(2.9)s and 7(3;11) frequencies per combat, demonstrated longer periods and higher frequency than Winning International Championship combats, with 18.3(2.9)s and 3(1; 6) frequency, respectively. Losing Olympic combats, with 1.3(1.7)s, demonstrated shorter periods of Attack to Right than Winning International Championship combats, with 2.8(3.8). The present time-motion and tactical analysis differences can be used to conduct judo activities with tactical developments and physical elements with analogous specific demands.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianca Miarka & Fabrício B. Del Vecchio & Ricardo Julianetti & Rubiana Cury & Suzi Camey & Emerson Franchini, 2016. "Time-motion and tactical analysis of Olympic judo fighters," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 133-142, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:1:p:133-142
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2016.11868876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868876
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2016.11868876?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:16:y:2016:i:1:p:133-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.