IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v15y2015i3p1022-1036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positional tackle and collision rates in Super Rugby

Author

Listed:
  • Riaan Schoeman
  • Derik Coetzee
  • Robert Schall

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate differences between playing positions regarding tackle and collision rates in a rugby game, and to determine the collision rates of individual playing positions in professional rugby union. Data from 30 matches (both teams involved) during the 2013 Super Rugby Season were captured and supplied by the Cheetahs Super Rugby Franchise, using the Verusco TryMaker Pro. Significant differences were found between positional groups regarding tackle rates. However, the front row players and second row players did not differ significantly (positions 1, 2, or 3 vs positions 4, or 5; p=0.0715 to p=0.6324). Within a positional group, only the difference between the inside centre and the other inside backs was significant (9 vs 12, p=0.0029; 10 vs 12, p=0.0045; 12 vs 13, p=0.0100). No significant differences were observed between second row players and the eighthman (4 vs 8, p=0.4183 and 5 vs 8, p=0.6863), although significant differences were found between second row players and the rest of the loose forwards (6 and 7). A significant difference (p≤0.05) occurred between all forwards and backs when collision rates were compared. The findings revealed significant inter-positional differences in tackling and collision rates within the same positional group.

Suggested Citation

  • Riaan Schoeman & Derik Coetzee & Robert Schall, 2015. "Positional tackle and collision rates in Super Rugby," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 1022-1036, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:15:y:2015:i:3:p:1022-1036
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2015.11868848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2015.11868848
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2015.11868848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:15:y:2015:i:3:p:1022-1036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.