IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v15y2015i2p501-512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Facilitating Emotions Really Facilitative? A Field Study of the Relationships between Discrete Emotions and Objective Performance during Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Martinent
  • Claude Ferrand

Abstract

This study explored discrete emotions - objective performance relationship during competition using a video-assisted self-confrontation approach. Thirty self-confrontation interviews were conducted with national table tennis players. Quantitative analyses of interviews showed that participants: (a) experienced more pleasant and facilitating emotions and less unpleasant and debilitating emotions during winning vs. losing sets; (b) performed well during experience of multiple-point facilitating anxiety; (c) failed to perform up to their potential during experience of multiple point debilitating anger, anxiety, and discouragement. Overall, results of the present study expand knowledge base by highlighting: (a) the main role played by frequency of (facilitating and debilitating) discrete emotions on the emotion-objective performance relationship during competition; (b) the prominent role played by duration of discrete emotions on objective performance variability; (c) the influence of a wide range of discrete emotions experienced by athletes while competing on their objective levels of performance during competition; and (d) that athletes who rated discrete emotions as facilitating performed up to their potential and those who rated discrete emotions as debilitating really failed to perform up to their potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Martinent & Claude Ferrand, 2015. "Are Facilitating Emotions Really Facilitative? A Field Study of the Relationships between Discrete Emotions and Objective Performance during Competition," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 501-512, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:15:y:2015:i:2:p:501-512
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2015.11868809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2015.11868809
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2015.11868809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:15:y:2015:i:2:p:501-512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.