IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v14y2014i2p384-400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inspecting teammates’ coverage during attacking plays in a football game: A case study

Author

Listed:
  • M. Filipe Clemente
  • Fernando M. L. Martins
  • S. Micael Couceiro
  • S. Rui Mendes
  • António J. Figueiredo

Abstract

The tactical behaviour of football players is fundamental in sport teams. Despite this importance, the methods to measure such behaviour are very time-consuming for human operators. Therefore, the aim of this case study was to propose a set of collective technological metrics to evaluate the attacking coverage provided by teammates to the player in possession of the ball. For this case study data was collected from three official matches of the same professional team. Using the information about the Cartesian position of players in the field provided from a tracking method, it was possible to propose four different technological metrics and ratios: i) cover in support; ii) cover in vigilance; iii) attacking cover; and iv) depth mobility. Using those metrics it was possible to observe that on average the team observed use with higher regularity support in vigilance as well as depth mobility, thus suggesting a specific tactical behaviour. In summary, it was possible to apply all metrics to real data from three official matches, thus allowing a new technological method to improve the match analysis systems that use multiplayer tracking.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Filipe Clemente & Fernando M. L. Martins & S. Micael Couceiro & S. Rui Mendes & António J. Figueiredo, 2014. "Inspecting teammates’ coverage during attacking plays in a football game: A case study," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 384-400, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:14:y:2014:i:2:p:384-400
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2014.11868729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868729
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2014.11868729?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:14:y:2014:i:2:p:384-400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.