IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rmobxx/v21y2026i3p722-742.html

Techno-aesthetic gendered bicycle-cyclist assemblages in Brussels: qualitative interviews, situated statistics and multifactor analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Natacha Lapeyroux
  • Sarah Bourcier
  • Claire Pelgrims

Abstract

Drawing on work on mobilities, material culture, visual sociology and the gender of objects, this article proposes to analyse the current tensions in the relationship to cycling equipment in Brussels public space. In particular, between the dominant norms of ‘femininity’ and ‘masculinity’ and the emerging values of cycling as a symbol and vector of an alternative, sustainable society that challenges adherence to traditional gender roles and patriarchal division of labour. We conducted interviews with professionals from cycling sector to gather their performative discourses concerning gender norms in cycling in Brussels. From a mobile video-ethnography, we took screenshots of cyclists in the Brussels public space. This method aims to capture the gender performance of cyclists in their daily mobilities using situated statistics to analyse a wide range of visual indicators, through descriptive and factor analysis to report on the relationships of proximity (congruency) and distance (opposition) between different objects and positioning. If the techno-aesthetic gendered bicycle-cyclist assemblages are still mostly marked by stereotypes, new emerging practices transform the bicycle’s materiality at the margin or in rupture with the dominant standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Natacha Lapeyroux & Sarah Bourcier & Claire Pelgrims, 2026. "Techno-aesthetic gendered bicycle-cyclist assemblages in Brussels: qualitative interviews, situated statistics and multifactor analysis," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 722-742, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rmobxx:v:21:y:2026:i:3:p:722-742
    DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2025.2576275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17450101.2025.2576275
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17450101.2025.2576275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rmobxx:v:21:y:2026:i:3:p:722-742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rmob20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.