IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rmobxx/v21y2026i1p214-231.html

Intersectional (in)securities - multiply marginalised women’s experiences of (un)safety on public transport

Author

Listed:
  • Esma Geliş
  • Franziska X. Meinherz

Abstract

In recent years, equitable access to safe and inclusive transport has become a policy priority. However, women’s experiences in public transport are still shaped by gender-specific safety concerns, and studies on marginalisation reveal forms of exclusion based on age, class, queerness, and racialisation. To complement existing research that mainly analyses these dimensions in isolation, we take an intersectional approach and focus on mobility biographies to study how multiply marginalised women experience (un)safety on public transport in Munich. Through a qualitative, ethnographic research design, we identify key factors influencing their sense of (un)safety: the spatial and social environment, intersectional experiences of discrimination, and their specific socialisation as marginalised women. We found that despite experiences of harassment or violence, many women reported feeling relatively safe. This paradox is linked to them normalising harassment as something to expect as women on public transport. Participants’ feelings of (un)safety were shaped by life-long socialisation, including cautionary tales from family and friends as well as past experiences. To navigate feelings of unsafety, participants developed strategies to minimise risks, which represented an additional mental load. Our study highlights the need for mobility policies that tackle the structural roots of transport-related unsafety through intersectional and proactive justice-oriented planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Esma Geliş & Franziska X. Meinherz, 2026. "Intersectional (in)securities - multiply marginalised women’s experiences of (un)safety on public transport," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 214-231, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rmobxx:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:214-231
    DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2025.2532404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17450101.2025.2532404
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17450101.2025.2532404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rmobxx:v:21:y:2026:i:1:p:214-231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rmob20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.