IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rmobxx/v13y2018i2p185-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governing circulation through technology within EU border security practice-networks

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios Glouftsios

Abstract

In this paper, I critically interrogate efforts to govern circulations of non-EU citizens to and within the Schengen area. I do so by dwelling on the functionalities of information systems used, among other purposes, for border security. My argument is twofold. First, I contend that circulations are governed within nexuses of technologically mediated control practices (practice-networks) performed outside, at the edges of, and inside the Schengen area. Second, I show that information systems, borders, mobile bodies, and security rationales do not remain fixed throughout the process of governing circulations, but emerge, mutate and multiply through their ongoing (re)enactment within practice-networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios Glouftsios, 2018. "Governing circulation through technology within EU border security practice-networks," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 185-199, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rmobxx:v:13:y:2018:i:2:p:185-199
    DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2017.1403774
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17450101.2017.1403774
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17450101.2017.1403774?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgios Glouftsios & Anna Casaglia, 2023. "Epidermal politics: Control, violence and dissent at the biometric border," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(3), pages 567-582, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rmobxx:v:13:y:2018:i:2:p:185-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rmob20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.