IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rmobxx/v10y2015i2p326-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enforcing Mobility: Spatial Mobility under the Regime of Activation

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Ludwig-Mayerhofer
  • Olaf Behrend

Abstract

Spatial mobility is rarely investigated with a view on social policy and welfare administrations. Yet, recent activation and workfare policies have increased pressures on the unemployed, with one of these pressures concerning spatial mobility, i.e. the requirement to accept jobs that entail long commuting hours or even relocation. This paper investigates the shift towards activation in Germany, focusing on increased demands on job-seekers' mobility, and uses a governmentality perspective, supplemented by the concept of symbolic violence, to gain insight into the strategies and practices deployed by Public Employment Service (PES) staff to produce 'mobile selves'. It demonstrates that perceptions of (im)mobility figure prominently in the assessment not only of job-seekers' labour market prospects but also of their character and motivation to seek work. Thus, the personal and familial implications of mobility are considered as mitigating circumstances mainly in the case of older jobless with poor labour market prospects. The majority of job-seekers, and particularly those living in regions with high unemployment, are subject to efforts on the part of PES staff to make them understand the necessity of being as mobile as possible; if such insight is found wanting, pedagogical devices are deployed to enhance job-seekers' mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Ludwig-Mayerhofer & Olaf Behrend, 2015. "Enforcing Mobility: Spatial Mobility under the Regime of Activation," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 326-343, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rmobxx:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:326-343
    DOI: 10.1080/17450101.2014.898930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17450101.2014.898930
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17450101.2014.898930?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rmobxx:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:326-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rmob20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.