IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rmdjxx/v12y2020i1p1-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sovereign wealth funds and cross-border investment bias: the case of Arab countries

Author

Listed:
  • Ibrahim Elbadawi
  • Raimundo Soto
  • Chahir Zaki

Abstract

Assets managed by sovereign wealth funds (SWF) have grown nine-fold since 2002, reaching USD 8 trillion in 2018. Around 80% of these investments correspond to cross-border investments. SWFs of Arab countries, mainly oil-rich GCC economies, hold a sizable fraction of these funds (40%). Asset allocation, nevertheless, presents a significant anomaly: despite the presence of highly endowed Arab-owned SWFs, cross-border investment in Arab economies is negligible in terms of transactions as well as of value. We study the allocation decisions of SWFs, both in terms of the probability of investing abroad (extensive margin) as well as the level of investment (intensive margin). In particular, we ask whether SWF investment decisions, at both margins, are largely determined by economic factors – e.g. profitability and risk – or are also influenced by strategic considerations, such as geopolitical interests. Our findings show that, while foreign investors have a positive bias for the Arab destination countries at the extensive margin level, there is a negative bias against them at the intensive one. At the sectoral level, results are highly heterogeneous as some sectors are sensitive to institutions (e.g. industry and consumer discretionary), while others are insensitive, such as energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibrahim Elbadawi & Raimundo Soto & Chahir Zaki, 2020. "Sovereign wealth funds and cross-border investment bias: the case of Arab countries," Middle East Development Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rmdjxx:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:1-23
    DOI: 10.1080/17938120.2020.1716429
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17938120.2020.1716429
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17938120.2020.1716429?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rmdjxx:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:1-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rmdj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.