IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rlshxx/v39y2018i1p57-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An early Modern pheasant farm at Saint-Pathus in the Seine-et-Marne, France

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Yves Dufour

Abstract

The pheasantry of Saint-Pathus is the first of its kind to be found, excavated and identified by archaeologists in France. It can be used as a model for the identification of all kinds of enclosures intended for the breeding of birds. The remains of this rural establishment are a quadrangular trenched enclosure, with an excavated surface of 2250 m2, defined by small ditches. The internal perimeter of the enclosure is bordered by a series of small structures. On the plan of Intendance of Paris (1784), the excavated enclosure corresponds to a pheasantry, named as such. What did a pheasantry look like? To understand the vestiges, we carried out an archaeological reading of agronomic and cynegetic literature on the subject. We tried to understand what type of archaeological remains would result from a place built for the breeding of pheasants. Twenty-three eighteenth-and nineteenth-century authors inform us of the standards traditionally observed and given for the breeding of pheasants. These treatises inform us about the right location for a pheasantry and its shape, and detail the care to be given to the laying areas. On the basis of treatises, an estimation of bird production is proposed for the pheasantry at Saint-Pathus. For each one of these topics, the excavated remains are compared with the description of pheasantries in traditional agricultural manuals and books related to hunting.This archaeological excavation provides an opportunity for considering the impact of social practices on land and environment management during the Modern period (seventeenth and eighteenth century).

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Yves Dufour, 2018. "An early Modern pheasant farm at Saint-Pathus in the Seine-et-Marne, France," Landscape History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 57-70, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:39:y:2018:i:1:p:57-70
    DOI: 10.1080/01433768.2018.1466550
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01433768.2018.1466550
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01433768.2018.1466550?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:39:y:2018:i:1:p:57-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rlsh20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.