IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rlshxx/v36y2015i1p47-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-medieval upland settlement and the decline of transhumance: a case-study from the Galtee Mountains, Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • Eugene Costello

Abstract

This paper examines evidence for transhumance in the Galtee Mountains during the post-medieval period, c. 1600-1900 a.d., and attempts to explain the reasons for its decline. The results of field survey into seasonal upland structures (or booley houses) occupied during this time are discussed while considering the difficulties involved in their identification and dating. In the parish of Kilbeheny, it is shown how a number of these booley houses were used in a nineteenth-century system of small-scale transhumance, contrasting this with what appears to have been a more important form of the practice in the mid-seventeenth century. The paper then goes on to demonstrate how population growth and the commercialisation of farming in the intervening period contributed to the marginalisation of transhumance in the regional farming economy. It is speculated that much of the extant archaeological evidence for seasonal settlement belongs to a post-1750, reduced, form of transhumance in which the produce of dairying was vital to the semisubsistence farming carried on by tenants on small and relatively new holdings in the foothills.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugene Costello, 2015. "Post-medieval upland settlement and the decline of transhumance: a case-study from the Galtee Mountains, Ireland," Landscape History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 47-69, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:36:y:2015:i:1:p:47-69
    DOI: 10.1080/01433768.2015.1044283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01433768.2015.1044283
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01433768.2015.1044283?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rlshxx:v:36:y:2015:i:1:p:47-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rlsh20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.