IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjusxx/v26y2022i3p463-477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do institutional designs matter for planning review? A garbage-can simulation approach

Author

Listed:
  • Feng-Tyan Lin
  • Shih-Kung Lai

Abstract

The fact that institutional design coordinates decisions are not a new idea, but the study of its effectiveness under different settings is still unrevealed. In this paper, inspired by the garbage-can model, we conduct a set of computer simulations of collective decision making based on urban land use planning and design review process. The simulation results show that institutional designs matter in affecting organizational performance, and that different distributions of case intricacies result in different outcomes of the collective decision making for planning review.

Suggested Citation

  • Feng-Tyan Lin & Shih-Kung Lai, 2022. "Do institutional designs matter for planning review? A garbage-can simulation approach," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3), pages 463-477, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjusxx:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:463-477
    DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2021.1888776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12265934.2021.1888776
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12265934.2021.1888776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjusxx:v:26:y:2022:i:3:p:463-477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjus20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.