IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjusxx/v20y2016i2p226-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating potential conflicts between right-turn-on-red vehicles and pedestrians at crosswalks

Author

Listed:
  • Wonho Kim
  • Gur-joong Kim
  • Dongmin Lee

Abstract

The conflict between vehicles and pedestrians at crosswalks, defined as a potential collision that could lead to actual traffic accidents, is an important measure indicating the level of pedestrian safety. Past research, with advanced statistical methods, gathered and calibrated data from historical accidents to produce this important policy indicator. To perform such statistical analysis, however, requires a considerable amount of samples collected under controlled conditions. Putting aside the difficulty of creating a controlled condition, it is difficult to apply the model in different locations with various physical conditions. These are critical limitations in practice. This study aims to overcome these issues and develops an analytical model for estimating the conflict between vehicles and pedestrians. Since the proposed model considers pedestrian behaviour at crosswalks rather than actual collision samples, only a small number of field data are required. It appears that our model can be replicated to different times and places with a bias that is statistically insignificant.

Suggested Citation

  • Wonho Kim & Gur-joong Kim & Dongmin Lee, 2016. "Estimating potential conflicts between right-turn-on-red vehicles and pedestrians at crosswalks," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 226-240, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjusxx:v:20:y:2016:i:2:p:226-240
    DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2016.1183511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/12265934.2016.1183511
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/12265934.2016.1183511?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjusxx:v:20:y:2016:i:2:p:226-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjus20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.