IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjrhxx/v13y2002i2p219-251.html

Known Facts or Reasonable Assumptions? An Examination of Alternative Sources of Housing Data

Author

Listed:
  • David Listokin
  • Elvin Wyly
  • Ioan Voicu
  • Brian Schmitt

Abstract

Researchers can choose from a wide variety of data sources to measure the dynamics of production, consumption, and change in America’s housing stock. Yet there have been few systematic comparisons of housing and household characteristics across data sets. Such considerations typically appear when differences in survey sampling, database content, or question wording are invoked to explain unexpected or inconsistent results.We describe key differences of nine data sets commonly used in housing research and provide an empirical analysis of differences among the American Housing Survey, the Consumer Expenditure Survey, the National Survey of Families and Households, and the Survey of Income and Program Participation. The analysis compares selected financial and demographic characteristics by household tenure. Although demographic characteristics such as age of householder and household size generally are comparable across data sets, there are considerable and statistically significant differences for important financial characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • David Listokin & Elvin Wyly & Ioan Voicu & Brian Schmitt, 2002. "Known Facts or Reasonable Assumptions? An Examination of Alternative Sources of Housing Data," Journal of Housing Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 219-251, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjrhxx:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:219-251
    DOI: 10.1080/26911337.2002.12519481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/26911337.2002.12519481
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/26911337.2002.12519481?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjrhxx:v:13:y:2002:i:2:p:219-251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjrh20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.