Author
Abstract
Problem, research strategy, and findingsHere I report the results of an evaluation of climate action plans for three cities in Ontario (Canada). The evaluation was guided by a framework containing criteria for assessing the degree to which climate action plans address distributive, procedural, recognition, and healing justice. The framework was developed through consultations with climate change scholars and representatives from equity-deserving groups. Results suggest there is considerable risk that equity-deserving groups will be left behind in the transition to more climate-friendly communities. Findings are based on empirical evidence from the plan evaluation and qualitative evidence from interviews with representatives from equity-deserving groups in the case study cities.Takeaway for practiceI offer recommendations for how planners and other urban actors can integrate equity considerations into municipal climate action planning. Planners can (a) actively support equity-deserving communities in transcending historical discrimination by specifying how underserved groups are part of the future vision for a community, (b) frame justice as a core focus of the planning process rather than an end that planning practice should strive to achieve, (c) address the current gap between best practice and actual practice regarding meaningful engagement of underserved communities, and (d) more carefully consider the potentially regressive outcomes of climate action. These actions require planners to educate themselves about the underlying drivers of inequity in a specific community.
Suggested Citation
Kayleigh Swanson, 2026.
"“The Big Ship Turns Around Slowly”: An Evaluation of Equity and Justice in Ontario Climate Action Plans,"
Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 92(2), pages 259-274, April.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:92:y:2026:i:2:p:259-274
DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2025.2587042
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:92:y:2026:i:2:p:259-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjpa20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.