Author
Abstract
Problem, research strategy, and findingsIntending to create surprise and reflection, this research started by testing outlandish staff reports with planning commissioners. Commissioners provided insights into what they want from staff reports, but unexpected results were the benefits of adding group reflective practice to planning commissioner training. Through fashion thinking and art, staff reports were reimagined as avant-garde and, using temperature-taking questions, discussed with focus groups of planning commissions across the United States. The major finding was the value of group reflective practice for planning commissioner training. Commissioners engaged with each other and their staffs on the work they do month-to-month discussing, commiserating, questioning, and sharing their experiences. For staff reports, results indicated the rational model is firmly established, but improvements can occur through communicative formats and collaborative understandings. Limitations of the research included the small number of planning commissions.Takeaway for practiceFor planning commissioner learning, group reflective practice fits into the category of development (rehearsals), supplementing training (competencies for the job at hand), and education (broad knowledge). Group reflective practice allows planning commissioners to hone skills and learn from real-life experiences. Staff reports make for an ideal starting point for this type of planning commissioner development as they occur regularly, allowing for trialability and reflecting-in-action. Other uses of group reflective practice can be for improving public hearings, dealing with ex parte contacts, examining bylaws, best uses of study sessions, and community engagement, to name a few.
Suggested Citation
Bonnie J. Johnson, 2026.
"Group Reflective Practice for Planning Commissioners,"
Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 92(1), pages 77-87, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:92:y:2026:i:1:p:77-87
DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2025.2538681
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:92:y:2026:i:1:p:77-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjpa20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.