Author
Listed:
- Kurt Kaminer
- Michelina M. Witte
- Gillian A. Hotz
Abstract
Problem, research strategy, and findings: Protected and separated bike lanes create low-stress, family-friendly bicycle infrastructure and community connectedness, increasing rider safety and parental acceptance of bicycling to school. However, the creation of such infrastructure is often beset with difficulty due to public perception and transportation priorities. In this case study, we examined the creation of widespread community support toward protected bike lane projects by combining a Bike to School Day event with a tactical, urbanism pop-up bike lane as a Bike Lane to School Day, based on advocacy efforts by the University of Miami BikeSafe Program at Coconut Grove Elementary School in Miami (FL). With the support of local stakeholders, including school district personnel, local community members, and transportation officials, these events resulted in more than 120 family participants riding to school, concurrent with a reduction in automotive drop-off traffic of up to 30% during the intervention. A total of 73 parents completed a post-event online survey, which provided feedback regarding the role such infrastructure improvements could provide for their children. Takeaway for practice: The combination of Bike to School Day with a pop-up, protected bike lane—a Bike Lane to School Day—can lead to an increase in the number of families and youths riding bikes to school, a decrease in automobile traffic, and favorable community and leadership support for providing permanent bicycling facilities to benefit youth mobility.
Suggested Citation
Kurt Kaminer & Michelina M. Witte & Gillian A. Hotz, 2026.
"Case Study: Using Pop-Up Protected Bike Lanes to Encourage Community Support for Safe Streets,"
Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 92(1), pages 63-76, January.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:92:y:2026:i:1:p:63-76
DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2025.2537662
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:92:y:2026:i:1:p:63-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjpa20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.