IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjpaxx/v83y2017i1p93-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chance and Design: From Architecture to Institutional Design

Author

Listed:
  • Ernest R. Alexander

Abstract

Much in Alexander’s life happened by chance. Born in Germany, he grew up in South Africa where he discovered design—a continuing concern—and qualified as an architect; chance and inclination led him to practice planning. In Berkeley (CA) for a planning education, curiosity initiated a 30-year academic career as a planning theorist and educator. This Perspective has two threads: design and contingency. Design means devising possible courses of action: Alexander reviews his design engagement at various levels, from designing buildings through policies and plans to institutional design. Contingency planning adapts to complexity and uncertainty; contingency thinking avoids generalizations, hence the need for detailed institutional design. In planning theory, contingency implies dissent and diversity, to suggest that planning is diverse planning practices, each with its planning theories. Alexander’s message: Be critical, of theories, institutions, and practices. Be modest: planners’ roles in knowledge-centered practices (e.g., spatial planning) should reflect their particular practice. Be confident: planners share their substantive knowledge and apply design and planning skills in the co-construction of knowledge that is participative planning. This is our unique contribution to making a better world.

Suggested Citation

  • Ernest R. Alexander, 2017. "Chance and Design: From Architecture to Institutional Design," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 93-102, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:83:y:2017:i:1:p:93-102
    DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2016.1249009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01944363.2016.1249009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01944363.2016.1249009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjpaxx:v:83:y:2017:i:1:p:93-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjpa20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.