IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjouxx/v8y2015i2p148-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the impacts of integrating New Urbanist neighborhood and street design ideals with conventional traffic engineering standards: the case of Stapleton

Author

Listed:
  • Wesley E. Marshall

Abstract

This research considers the implications of building places that possess many of the qualities that make New Urbanism so desirable but also marginalizing them with other qualities that prioritize automobility to meet the demands of conventional traffic engineering standards. By examining the existing built environment of Stapleton - a New Urbanist development in Denver, Colorado - in terms of street network characteristics, street designs, and intersection designs, I investigate the inconsistencies of the resulting built environment with respect to the latest research and state-of-the-practice New Urbanism design ideals. The outcomes are then considered in terms of how people actually use the transportation system by way of vehicle speed studies and travel diaries. The trends suggest that mixing New Urbanist neighborhood and street design characteristics with conventional traffic engineering standards results in travel behaviors more consistent with conventional auto-oriented developments.

Suggested Citation

  • Wesley E. Marshall, 2015. "Understanding the impacts of integrating New Urbanist neighborhood and street design ideals with conventional traffic engineering standards: the case of Stapleton," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 148-172, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:8:y:2015:i:2:p:148-172
    DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2014.896826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17549175.2014.896826
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17549175.2014.896826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:8:y:2015:i:2:p:148-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjou20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.