IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjouxx/v18y2025i2p280-302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public open space in high density cities: the case of Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Rossini

Abstract

Using a combination of empirical research methods such as spatial analysis and on-site observation, this article aims to shed light on the physical and social characteristics of 27 Public Open Spaces (POSs) in Central and Western Districts in Hong Kong. This study will contribute to a better understanding of their role, function and usage, so as to help establish a broader strategy for the revitalisation and upgrading of these important public resources. The results of the analysis indicate that a large percentage of the POSs examined have several shortcomings that may contribute to their low usage, and which render them unattractive. Poor accessibility, outdated design principles, the absence of active frontages and a lack of flexibility in the use of the space are some of the factors that the rigid application of planning policies have produced over the years. As such, this study suggests that a revision of current urban design guidelines, in light of the shortcomings that they have inadvertently generated, could establish a new direction in the provision and management of POSs in Hong Kong, providing new opportunities to create a more sustainable and people-friendly urban environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Rossini, 2025. "Public open space in high density cities: the case of Hong Kong," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 280-302, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:280-302
    DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2022.2123380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17549175.2022.2123380
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17549175.2022.2123380?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:280-302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjou20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.