IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjouxx/v15y2022i2p241-257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does compact development in midsize cities contribute to quality of life?

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Habibi
  • Esfandiar Zebardast

Abstract

Compactness of cities has been introduced as one of the policies to ensure a higher level of quality of life (QOL). Although it has been claimed that urban compactness will increase the QOL, the empirical research on the topic, especially in developing counties, is quite limited. this research attempts to find the effects of compactness on subjective Physical-Environmental Quality of Life (PEQOL). For this purpose, three midsize cities in Iran are selected as case studies. By applying Explorative Factor Analysis (EFA), three domains are identified to represent compactness: density-mixed uses, accessibility, and centrality. Moreover, to find PEQOL domains, 1078 questionnaires were administered in three cities. Using EFA, five domains of environment, access to services, access to educational land uses, transportation, and housing were identified as PEQOL underlying domains. Multivariate Regression Analysis (MRA) is used to explore the relationship between compactness and PEQOL. The results of the MRA reveal that there is a significant relationship between compactness and PEQOL. Also, the relationship between PEQOL and factors contributing the most to compactness was explored. The results show that the density-mixed use is the only domain that explains PEQOL variance in all cities studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Habibi & Esfandiar Zebardast, 2022. "Does compact development in midsize cities contribute to quality of life?," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 241-257, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:241-257
    DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2021.1880959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17549175.2021.1880959
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17549175.2021.1880959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:15:y:2022:i:2:p:241-257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjou20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.