IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjouxx/v14y2021i3p309-336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digging up the past: urban agriculture narratives in Melbourne and São Paulo

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian H. Hearn
  • Thaís Mauad
  • Chris Williams
  • Luis Fernando Amato-Lourenço
  • Guilherme Reis Ranieri

Abstract

As urban agriculture becomes increasingly recognised as a contributor to nutritional and civic wellbeing, real estate developers and community associations have promoted it to advance distinct agendas. The article analyses this phenomenon in Melbourne and São Paulo, where colonial and industrial legacies have set the stage for urban agriculture’s resurgence and resulting “internal contradictions.” Developers of upmarket condominiums in both cities advertise urban agriculture as a purchasable commodity capable of recovering customers’ lost connections with nature and each other. However, the gentrifying effects of these developments deepen rather than alleviate social and environmental ills. By contrast, community projects profiled in four case studies emphasised urban agriculture’s ability to confront the long-term neglect of land, employment, and environment. We conclude that the capacity of urban agriculture to improve food systems is enhanced when proponents develop historically informed narratives that engage and inform consumers and municipal governments.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian H. Hearn & Thaís Mauad & Chris Williams & Luis Fernando Amato-Lourenço & Guilherme Reis Ranieri, 2021. "Digging up the past: urban agriculture narratives in Melbourne and São Paulo," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 309-336, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:309-336
    DOI: 10.1080/17549175.2020.1828144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17549175.2020.1828144
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17549175.2020.1828144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjouxx:v:14:y:2021:i:3:p:309-336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjou20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.