IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjerxx/v47y2025i4p488-530.html

To Change or Not to Change: The Informativeness of REIT Annual Reports

Author

Listed:
  • George D. Cashman
  • David M. Harrison
  • Hainan Sheng
  • Joseph Wall

Abstract

Increasingly similar corporate disclosures may fail to provide potential investors with adequate information about a company to facilitate astute, informed, and/or rational decision making. In light of this repeatedly expressed SEC concern, the current investigation uses a sample of 1,910 annual report (10-k) filings by 234 separate equity REITs from 2000-2020 to examine the impact of year-over-year linguistic similarity on the perceived information content of corporate disclosures. Consistent with the aforementioned concerns, we document a significant increase in the degree of REIT annual report similarity over time. Despite this trend, we find that innovations in annual report disclosures remain directly related to observable changes in both the operational complexity and financial position of the firm. Furthermore, these innovations engender significant market reactions including changes in options trading activity, annual report readability, and the firm’s cost of equity capital. Lastly, these findings are both robust to the inclusion of alternative information channels and are significantly more pronounced within informationally opaque market settings. In sum, we find REIT annual reports remain a value-relevant source of information for market participants.

Suggested Citation

  • George D. Cashman & David M. Harrison & Hainan Sheng & Joseph Wall, 2025. "To Change or Not to Change: The Informativeness of REIT Annual Reports," Journal of Real Estate Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 488-530, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:47:y:2025:i:4:p:488-530
    DOI: 10.1080/08965803.2024.2357869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08965803.2024.2357869
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08965803.2024.2357869?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjerxx:v:47:y:2025:i:4:p:488-530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjer20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.