IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjeaxx/v16y2022i2p269-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Twitter and political discourses: how supporters of Zimbabwe’s ruling ZANU PF party use Twitter for political engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Bhekizulu Bethaphi Tshuma
  • Lungile Augustine Tshuma
  • Mphathisi Ndlovu

Abstract

Social networks such as Twitter are transforming political engagements in contemporary societies. Dominant literature places emphasis on the counter-hegemonic opportunities offered by social media in the Zimbabwean political landscape. However, there is a need to draw scholarly attention to how supporters of the ruling party, Zimbabwe African National Union – Patriotic Front (ZANU PF), are appropriating and using Twitter for political engagements. Drawing upon the case of Varakashi (ZANU PF’s social media trolls and supporters), this paper examines how supporters of the ruling party in the post-Robert Mugabe era are increasingly occupying online spaces that were traditionally associated with opposition voices. President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s regime has been grappling with legitimacy issues in the wake of the November 2017 coup that toppled Mugabe, the contested July 2018 election, and the shooting of civilians in August 2018. Focusing on four Twitter handles of Varakashi, this article employs rhetorical argumentation to analyse how these Twitter propagandists are defending and promoting the interests of the Mnangagwa regime. Findings demonstrate that the Varakashi are sanitising and justifying the November 2017 coup, campaigning for Mnangagwa in the July 2018 election, and in justifying the killing of civilians in August 2018.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhekizulu Bethaphi Tshuma & Lungile Augustine Tshuma & Mphathisi Ndlovu, 2022. "Twitter and political discourses: how supporters of Zimbabwe’s ruling ZANU PF party use Twitter for political engagement," Journal of Eastern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 269-288, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:16:y:2022:i:2:p:269-288
    DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2022.2076385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17531055.2022.2076385
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17531055.2022.2076385?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:16:y:2022:i:2:p:269-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.