IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjeaxx/v16y2022i1p25-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Plural-legalities and the clash between customary law and ‘child rights talk’ among rural communities in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • David Otieno Ngira

Abstract

Plural-legal societies are often characterized by a clash between various conflicting socio-legal realities. This paper starts by exploring the various contestations in human rights and the clash between rights and moral values. Using fieldwork from the Kipsigis community in Kenya, this paper explores the clash between community customary value systems and the language of rights as contained in child rights instruments. The paper demonstrates the prevalence of care ethics as a customary value system and examines how care ethics is upheld or (violated) in children’s matters among grassroots communities such as the Kipsigis. This research revealed that contrary to universalized notions of child well-being which are anchored on rights realization, children among the Kipsigis attain their well-being through non-rights based approaches that encompass the ethics of care and the ‘do no harm principle’ as well as that of customary entitlements (living rights) whose foundation and enforcement systems are different from universal notions of rights.

Suggested Citation

  • David Otieno Ngira, 2022. "Plural-legalities and the clash between customary law and ‘child rights talk’ among rural communities in Kenya," Journal of Eastern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 25-46, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:25-46
    DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2022.2070301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17531055.2022.2070301
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17531055.2022.2070301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:16:y:2022:i:1:p:25-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.