IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjeaxx/v14y2020i2p165-184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feeling the heat: responses to geothermal development in Kenya’s Rift Valley

Author

Listed:
  • Lotte Hughes
  • Daniel Rogei

Abstract

Geothermal development in Kenya’s Rift Valley will reap enormous energy benefits for the nation as a whole. But its impacts upon local communities, in this case in the Ol Karia area of Nakuru County, are often negative, and geothermal expansion has led to many divisions and conflicts over equitable resource use, environmental degradation, health impacts on humans and animals, forced resettlement, access to benefits including jobs, houses and profit sharing, human and land rights, and community representation vis-á-vis the geothermal companies. Many questions have been raised about the role of the state and international financial institutions (IFIs). Accusations abound at grassroots level of nepotism, corruption and discrimination, and some indigenous residents accuse the majority Maasai of doubly marginalising them in the scramble for rights and benefits. Against a background of historical continuities, land injustices, and global struggles for indigenous and marginalised peoples’ rights, this article examines the conflicts and complexities surrounding geothermal development at Ol Karia and its environs, and describes how people on the ground see the prospects for future peaceful co-existence with extractive industry on their lands.

Suggested Citation

  • Lotte Hughes & Daniel Rogei, 2020. "Feeling the heat: responses to geothermal development in Kenya’s Rift Valley," Journal of Eastern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 165-184, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:165-184
    DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2020.1716292
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17531055.2020.1716292
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17531055.2020.1716292?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:14:y:2020:i:2:p:165-184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.