IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjeaxx/v13y2019i3p409-427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Muted market signals: politics, petroleum investments and regulatory developments in Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Rasmus Hundsbæk Pedersen
  • Peter Bofin

Abstract

This article contributes to an emergent literature identifying expectations and domestic politics as the drivers of change in Africa’s ‘new oil’-producing countries. Whereas much attention has been paid to weak institutions as an explanation for the resource curse that has marred Africa’s petroleum economies, the article points to the interplay between oil markets and domestic politics that is still under-researched. Based on empirical research into contractual and regulatory changes in mainland Tanzania, the article provides an overview of the development of the country’s petroleum sector and argues that for a new oil country it is a constant struggle to keep abreast of market signals. Changes to contractual and regulatory regimes therefore tend to come rather late in the price cycle, both when high global oil prices allow for tougher fiscal terms and when falling prices call for downward adjustments. This was the case historically and is no less the case in today’s resource nationalist environment, in which terms have been toughened despite falling global oil prices. Driven by electoral politics, decision-making has been politicized to such extent that exploration activities have come to an almost complete halt and no new contracts are being signed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rasmus Hundsbæk Pedersen & Peter Bofin, 2019. "Muted market signals: politics, petroleum investments and regulatory developments in Tanzania," Journal of Eastern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 409-427, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:13:y:2019:i:3:p:409-427
    DOI: 10.1080/17531055.2019.1605770
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17531055.2019.1605770
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17531055.2019.1605770?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjeaxx:v:13:y:2019:i:3:p:409-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjea .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.