IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v41y2026i2p293-313.html

Borderscapes Inside Out: New Transdisciplinary Methodological Horizons for Critical Border Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Chiara Brambilla
  • Andrea Masala

Abstract

In critical border studies, interdisciplinary approaches are often stressed as pivotal analytical perspectives for obtaining a comprehensive understanding of borderscaping dynamics. However, the substantial contributions in this direction made by social sciences, humanities, and border studies are often limited to a theoretical and conceptual layer. The increasingly mobile, de/re/territorialized, and processual dimensions of contemporary borders require an additional step. We are still lacking adequate transdisciplinary methodological instruments to operationalize our theoretical knowledge of the complexity of b/ordering processes. What functional tactics could be used to address this necessity? This article suggests that (re)conceiving the border not only as a subject but also as a transdisciplinary method is the epistemic frame through which to answer this question. Specifically, we discuss the design of our participatory action-research within the BorderArt(E)Scapes project as a tool for developing new applied transdisciplinary research methodologies that enhance the dialogue between anthropological, artistic, art-historical, and educational perspectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiara Brambilla & Andrea Masala, 2026. "Borderscapes Inside Out: New Transdisciplinary Methodological Horizons for Critical Border Studies," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 293-313, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:41:y:2026:i:2:p:293-313
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2025.2576202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2025.2576202
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2025.2576202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:41:y:2026:i:2:p:293-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.