IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v40y2025i6p1405-1424.html

(De-)Bordering Through Discursive Practices: Ambivalent Narratives on the EU External Border Crises

Author

Listed:
  • Elżbieta Opiłowska

Abstract

This article examines the narratives surrounding the border crises on the EU’s external border as constructed by the governing political actors in Poland in the period 2021–2023. Drawing on the discourse-historical approach and building on the social construction of a border, it examines the frames, contexts, standpoints, and narrative strategies that have been used to justify (in)hospitable policies toward migrants on both the Polish–Belarusian and Polish–Ukrainian borders. By analyzing the official statements of Polish politicians, ambivalent narratives justifying the securitized border regime and the humanitarian open border were identified. However, both bordering and de-bordering discursive practices were realized through polarization strategies and racialization of people on the move at both borders, portraying them as dehumanized “others” or individualized “our Slavic neighbors.” As such, this article contributes to borderlands studies from the perspective of discursive practices and identifies narrative strategies that can be applied within broader discourse and research on migration and borders in Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Elżbieta Opiłowska, 2025. "(De-)Bordering Through Discursive Practices: Ambivalent Narratives on the EU External Border Crises," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 1405-1424, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:40:y:2025:i:6:p:1405-1424
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2025.2463908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2025.2463908
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2025.2463908?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:40:y:2025:i:6:p:1405-1424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.