IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v38y2023i1p21-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Operation Eagle Eye”: Border Citizenship and Cross-border Voting in Ghana’s Fourth Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Edem Adotey

Abstract

This article examines the role of elections in bordering through disputes over cross-border voting since Ghana returned to multi-party democracy in 1992. It uses case studies from some communities that border Togo in the Volta Region of Ghana which is the epicenter of alleged cross-border voting. In these communities, “border citizenship” is expressed through the deployment of ritual space, social and political relations which is across national borders. But this begs the question whether border citizens view voting as a right or not, or more specifically, contest the border by participating in elections on either side of the border. This article argues that border citizens are not only involved in contesting the border; one can assume to have a border citizenship and still respect the border in elections by refusing the act of cross-border voting. This study not only contributes to border studies by highlighting the importance of electoral politics in the bordering process but it also brings to light the complexities of cross-border voting, since it shows that border residents in the Ghana-Togo borderland communities do not all perceive cross-border voting positively.

Suggested Citation

  • Edem Adotey, 2023. "“Operation Eagle Eye”: Border Citizenship and Cross-border Voting in Ghana’s Fourth Republic," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 21-38, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:38:y:2023:i:1:p:21-38
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2020.1861551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2020.1861551
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2020.1861551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:38:y:2023:i:1:p:21-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.