IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v36y2021i1p59-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bright Ideas, Thick Institutions. Post-industrial Development Theories as Drivers of Cross-border Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Marijn Molema

Abstract

Administrative frameworks from different European countries meet each other in the territorial entity of the so-called “Euroregion” or “Euregio.” Social scientists have reflected on the administrative capacity of these political entities, and stressed the importance of historical variables. This contribution adds to one of these historical variables: the evolution of economic ideas. Inspired by Blyth’s theory that ideas precede institutional change, the article reviews the paradigmatic shift from industrial to endogenous growth theory in the 1970s and 1980s. New ideas stimulated cooperation on cross-border development strategies, thus changing the role of borders in Europe. This process is illustrated with examples from the Dutch-German border region. From an historical perspective, the success of Euroregions cannot be assessed by looking on the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation in the present day alone. The history of the last decades deserves our attention too. Especially the role of Euroregions in the process of translating endogenous growth ideas into the practice of regional economic policies requires more academic attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Marijn Molema, 2021. "Bright Ideas, Thick Institutions. Post-industrial Development Theories as Drivers of Cross-border Cooperation," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 59-75, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:36:y:2021:i:1:p:59-75
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2018.1496467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2018.1496467
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2018.1496467?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:36:y:2021:i:1:p:59-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.