IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rjbsxx/v35y2020i5p781-799.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

At War Over the Peace Bridge. A Case Study in the Vulnerability of Binational Institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Munroe Eagles

Abstract

Bridges are powerful symbols of the overcoming of differences. This is particularly true of the Peace Bridge that spans the international border formed by the Niagara River and links together southern Ontario and western New York. When it was dedicated on August 7, 1927, the Peace Bridge was named to commemorate more than a century of peaceful relations and prosperity between Canada and the United States. Illustrating the close ties the bridge has helped foster, the structure has become the second busiest crossing on the Canadian–American border. Yet, precisely as the two countries commemorated two centuries of peaceful and (largely) harmonious relations since the end of the War of 1812, the governance of the Peace Bridge descended into a crisis that a journalist dubbed the “war of 2012”. This paper will describe the circumstances that led to the deterioration of relations between the five Canadian and five American members of the facility’s governing board. What emerges from a close account of the debacle is a portrait of the fragility of binational organizations and a reminder of what is required for them to operate smoothly.

Suggested Citation

  • Munroe Eagles, 2020. "At War Over the Peace Bridge. A Case Study in the Vulnerability of Binational Institutions," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 781-799, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:35:y:2020:i:5:p:781-799
    DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2018.1465354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08865655.2018.1465354
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08865655.2018.1465354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rjbsxx:v:35:y:2020:i:5:p:781-799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rjbs20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.